011: Here’s To You …Being Responsible For Me

Stella Case No. 011, Originally Published: 16 October 2002

Dustin W. Bailey, 22, spent the evening of 12 August 2000 drinking in a bar in Teays Valley, W.Va. Apparently seeking a warm place to lie down after he left the bar, he crawled under a truck sitting in front of a pizza parlor across the street.

The poor truck driver was forced (FORCED I say!) to park out in front of the pizza joint to make a delivery.

The truck’s driver was inside the restaurant making a delivery. When he came out, he got in his truck and drove away. He had no idea anyone was under the truck; Bailey was run over and killed. A post-mortem found he had a blood alcohol level of 0.19 percent, nearly double the 0.10 percent legal presumption of intoxication in that state.

A tragic accident? Well, no, says Bailey’s mother, Josephine Bailey of Hometown, W.Va. She says her son certainly wouldn’t have crawled under a truck voluntarily. “We just can’t imagine our son doing that,” she said at the time. (So we’re to assume she had never seen him — or anyone else — drunk?) Since he just wouldn’t do such a thing, someone else must take the blame for her son’s death. So she filed a lawsuit in Putnam Circuit Court asking for more than $350,000 from:

  • Papa John’s Pizza, because its Teays Valley restaurant “forced” the truck driver to park on a public street — right in the way of her staggering son.
  • The truck driver, Samuel T. Stinson. The suit says Stinson should have looked under his truck before driving away, and he should have shut off the engine when he left it on the street.
  • The truck’s owner, Rollins Transportation Systems, Inc.
  • Rick’s Pub, where Bailey had been drinking, and its owner Richard E. Parsons, since the bar should have stopped serving him when he became intoxicated. (Isn’t that why Bailey left?!)

Traffic fatalities are investigated by the police. What does the Putnam County Sheriff’s Department have to say about who might be responsible for Bailey’s death? “If anyone should be blamed for that death,” says Chief Deputy John Dailey, “it’s that guy who climbed under the truck” — Bailey himself. Dailey found it “surprising” that his mother would sue over his self-inflicted death.

Imagine the anguish truck driver Samuel Stinson felt when he discovered he had accidentally killed someone he didn’t even know was there. Who looks under their cars before they drive away? He found out what happened when two men came running up to him. “Two guys yelled at me and told me that he was terrible drunk and that he had climbed under my trailer,” he told police after the accident.

No doubt if Mrs. Bailey finds out who those two guys are she’ll sue them, too, since surely everyone anywhere near her drunken, adult son that night had a duty to safeguard him. Everyone but himself, of course — his responsibility had been dissolved away in alcohol.


  • “Woman Files Suit Over Son’s Death,” Charleston Daily Mail, 10 August 2002.

Case Status

There’s not any mention of this suit that I could find online — not even the original newspaper article. But it’s a great example of what I call a “Sue ’em all and let god sort it out” case, reflecting on a saying that goes back to the Crusades.


Regarding a letter from last week where I cautioned a reader who said the cases I present make him “want to go out and slap some lawyer,” Michael in Florida writes:

“My partner is an attorney, currently working for the Attorney General’s office of Florida, helping abused and neglected children by getting them into safe and loving environments. When he was in private practice, he refused to take several potential cases which would have been Stella Award candidates. His sense of ethics and justice would not allow it. The other attorneys I have come to know over the years have these same values, especially those in the public sector. I guess I just wanted to put out a gentle reminder that MOST lawyers are good and decent people, trying to do the best they can for their clients and the ideals of justice.”

But Phil, an attorney in New Jersey, couldn’t handle the letter:

“One of your letter writers talked about going out and slapping a lawyer. You are pandering to a popular prejudice (the dislike of lawyers) by slanting the reporting of cases to make them appear to be frivolous. Everyone seems to hate lawyers — until they need one. I note that you are seeking ‘solutions’ from your readers to solve the problem posed the litigation reported by the Stella Awards…. No ‘solution’ is valid which jeopardizes any of our hard won freedoms.”

You presume, counselor, that I plan to rush out and embrace any quick fix, which flies in the face of what I said last week: “This is obviously a very complex issue that’s not going to be ‘fixed’ with a band-aid…. Take your time and think it out before writing — there’s no rush to this.”

Further, the cases I present aren’t “slanted to make them appear to be frivolous,” and that’s a pretty outrageous charge. I must necessarily summarize the cases I present and, as much as possible, I provide the specific articles(s) I used as source material so that readers can decide for themselves if the case is being fairly represented. Further, to say that running a letter shows I “pander to a popular prejudice by slanting reporting” is disingenuous. The letters are quite obviously the opinion of the identified author, not me, and I do run a fair selection of the letters that come in. I didn’t run the letter to “pander” to anything; rather, I assumed I’d get a good rejoinder to publish today. As you saw, I got one.

My 2020 Thoughts on the Case

As if these cases need to be “slanted” to make a point! As for the drunk in this case, people who choose to alter their thought process with chemicals, the consequences should fall on them, whether it’s blundering into their own injury or death, or negligently hurting others (as in drunk driving). Simple as that.

- - -

Email Subscriptions

No new cases are being published, so please don’t try to submit cases for inclusion on this site.

While there are no new cases coming, all of the previously published cases are returning to this site over time. You can subscribe to notifications as those classic cases are posted, scheduled for Mondays and Thursdays. Click here for a Stella Awards subscribe form.

Meanwhile, my flagship email publication This is True does continue to come out with new stories every week. It’s “Thought-Provoking Entertainment” like Stella, but uses weird-but-true news items as its vehicle for social commentary. It is the oldest entertainment newsletter online — weekly since 1994. Click here for a This is True subscribe form.

10 Comments on “011: Here’s To You …Being Responsible For Me

  1. As a professional truck driver, the LAST thing I want to do is to hurt someone while performing my job. Bad enough that we must have eyes all around our heads while out on the road, in today’s circumstances we must also look out for people wanting to prevent us from doing our job, whether it be protesters around meat processing facilities (PETA is a bad one for that; they are the main reason most jurisdictions have laws exonerating truck drivers from any responsibility in running over a protester, though I would hate to be forced to make that decision), or residents not wanting trucks going through their neighborhood, or for any other reason. That there are trucker-oriented PTSD support groups should tell you how often incidents occur, unfortunately.

    Your final sentence is chilling. -rc

    • Two of my friends lived what the trucking community calls suicide-by-truck. One of them is still unable to drive anything, not even a riding mower, and that happened in the mid-1990s, when he was still in his 20s. I wouldn’t wish that even to my worst enemy.

      Yep. Want to commit suicide? 95 percent of the time, it’s a dumb solution, but I feel it’s your right. BUT it’s unbelievably immoral to involve anyone else in your decision against their will — no exceptions. -rc

  2. Phil in New Jersey, says “Everyone seems to hate lawyers — until they need one.” Why does he think people stop hating lawyers just because they need one? 😉

    You’ll love the first letter published in the next case. 🙂 -rc

  3. If I were to hear of a case like that near where I live, I’d be sorely tempted to find out where the plaintiff lives, leave a breakable but non-living object under their car, and then sue them when they drive off and ‘negligently’ break it.

    They wouldn’t be able to contest being at fault without undermining their own case in the other lawsuit.

    Devious! -rc

  4. A line from your “Case Study” may be the way things really are.

    In 1979 I had a motorcycle accident, ruined the bike and shattered my elbow. I was on a cross country trip, and the night before, I had a flat rear tire. Was picked up by a tow truck and taken to the nearest town. The next morning, I called a local dealership who also did repairs. The shop sent a person out, who changed the inner tube on the rear wheel, and sent me on my way. Thirteen miles later, I “kissed” the roadway. When I went to see a lawyer to see if I had a case to sue for negligence, he informed me I did. I was a fairly inexperienced rider, and did not know that on motorcycle flats to forget about the inner tube and change the entire tire, because the steel belt beads have been ripped more than likely.

    The lawyer sued, not only the local dealership, but the American manufacturer, the tire manufacturer and the inner tube manufacturer. When I asked why those three who had nothing to do with the negligence involved, he told me that “you sue everybody, no matter how remotely involved because you only have a small window of time to file the suit, and, if later it is found that, say, the tire was defective in its manufacture and you haven’t included that entity, you are out of luck.

    As I pointed out to the lawyer, that isn’t right. He agreed, but said that is how the law is written (or was, in 1979.)

  5. The mother is obviously in denial, blaming everyone but her drunken son for his death…or maybe she’s just hoping to strike it rich. I feel sorry for the truck driver.

  6. I used to drive a box truck, delivering newspapers from the printing plant to distributors around the state of Florida, then hotel supplies to different locations around Central Florida. I eventually quit, because drivers in small vehicles would pull in front of me while I was on the highway, then hit their brakes. I eventually became convinced if I kept driving I’d hit somebody and either hurt or kill them.

    The last week I drove I had two vehicle malfunctions, and at one of my regular stops, a former employee went into a hotel and started shooting employees.

    Three incidents in one week was enough to make me park the truck when I got back to my employer’s warehouse, turn in my keys and quit on the spot.

    Wow. Good call. -rc


Leave a Comment